2 ms·
Iirc, System 1/2 thinking has been largely de-based (i.e., it could be a right model, but the evidence for that is tenuous) https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/
by readthenotes1 3y ago
Iirc, System 1/2 thinking has been largely de-based (i.e., it could be a right model, but the evidence for that is tenuous)
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/a-hovercraft-full-of-eels/202103/the-false-dilemma-system-1-vs-system-2 https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/a-hovercraft-full-of...
Makes me wonder if item (0) should be "Suspect every one" (with a nod to Maria Gambrelli, of course)
- jarmitage 3y agoArticle footnote b. states: "b. Parts of Kahneman's book were undermined by psychology's "replication crisis," which affected some of its findings, but not the idea of system 1 and 2." Would have been a better footnote if additional references were provided for the latest in that area of discourse.