7 ms·
>> by definition a vaccine should NOT be a treatment, a vaccine has to be preventative, and further personally I believe... Hmm, I don't see the basis for this
by dev_tty01 3y ago
>> by definition a vaccine should NOT be a treatment, a vaccine has to be preventative, and further personally I believe...
Hmm, I don't see the basis for this conclusion. This treatment is acting according to the common definition of a vaccine. Whether before or after disease activation is not part of the definition. As far as your personal belief, I understand that you may feel strongly, but I'm sorry to say that doesn't really enter into articulating an accepted scientific definition.
vaccine: any preventive preparation used to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific disease, ...
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vaccine https://www.dictionary.com/browse/vaccine
Could you be more specific about any particular legal shield? They all have to go through the same phased trials system. I don't see any reason to conclude this is a legal shenanigan. What they have created meets the well-known definition of a vaccine.
- AYBABTME 3y agoWithout taking a side or another.. I just want to note that the definition you shared starts with "preventive" which is the point GP is focusing on.
- futuretaint 3y agoI'm not taking a side either, but seeing as drug companies are shielded from liability w/ vaccines, if I was a drug company I would be motivated to lobby broadening the definition. it would just be good business.
- ceejayoz 3y agoDrug companies are only shielded for specific vaccines deemed necessary countermeasures. It isn’t automatic for all vaccines; the COVID vaccines had to be deliberately added to the list via a formal process.