See https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/16/fuse_macos_closed_source/ https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/16/fuse_macos_closed_sou... for more info. I wonder why

See https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/16/fuse_macos_closed_source/ https://www.theregister.com/2019/12/16/fuse_macos_closed_sou... for more info. I wonder why a dual-licensing approach was not pursued though, e.g. some viral license (AGPL?) for the open-source part. This could have the same benefit of getting companies to negotiate an explicit (paid) license agreement while still making source available.