4 ms·
Yeah, 2023 and reflowing documents still isn't a thing. Yay
by edoardo-schnell 3y ago
Yeah, 2023 and reflowing documents still isn't a thing. Yay
- Conscat 3y agoI read this on mobile and it felt pretty tedious. I wonder if maybe some minimal HTML could make the paragraphs reflow properly while still looking like a manpage everywhere.
- 082349872349872 3y agoWhat sort of keyhole are you peering through that needs to reflow 72-character text lines?
- plugin-baby 3y agoA phone? Your comment is 3 lines for me.
- 082349872349872 3y agoJust checked; both my comment and TFA appear full width on my phone. Bog-standard Android.
- dxdm 3y agoMaybe other people do not use the same setup as you do.
- 082349872349872 3y agoThat much is obvious given that a vanilla phone setup has no trouble with even 90-character lines. Not my business to stop anyone making things hard on themselves, though, so good luck you all! (do we have anyone who reads HN over a morse clacker?)
- pests 3y agoI have vision problems, I increase zoom a lot in desktop and mobile. What do you have against people different than youself?
- 082349872349872 3y agoNothing; I wished you luck! I imagine people with screenreaders have an even tougher time... (mobile I agree would be hopeless with zoom [I avoid reading on mine even without zoom], but does your desktop zoom mean even TFA's vt100-friendly 72-chars needed reflowing?)
- pests 3y agoI don't always increase zoom but TFA is def too small on desktop. I just increase until its readable, that being said, the article is comfortable for me at about 200-250%. Reflow issues seem to occur at 300% - so no issue for me but I could see some people going that high.
- Karellen 3y agoWhich is ironic, given that man pages do reflow on different-width terminals and have done since the '90s.