4 ms·
Perhaps this is a difference of definition, but when I think of "basic car" I understand that to mean the minimum vehicle that can legally operate on the road.
by AlotOfReading 3y ago
Perhaps this is a difference of definition, but when I think of "basic car" I understand that to mean the minimum vehicle that can legally operate on the road. Brakes, steering, lights, mirrors, airbags, etc. Backup cameras, AEB, and emissions controls, are all part of that now for better or worse.
As far as NHTSA is concerned, backup cameras are just as mandatory as working brakes. You can't build a vehicle that doesn't have them, and most (all?) states prohibit operating vehicles without these features. Tesla, Mercedes, Nissan, Toyota, Honda, and Subaru have all had safety recalls because of issues with software failing to display that image properly.
Older vehicles don't comply with these newer regulations and are only allowed to operate because of grandfather clauses.
- torstenvl 3y agoThere is no NHTSA standard I'm aware of that requires a vehicle to become inoperable if the backup camera loses functionality. There are no states I'm aware of that require a vehicle to become inoperable if the backup camera loses functionality. Please provide the C.F.R. link or state statute link you're talking about.
- AlotOfReading 3y agoYou're missing how FMVSS works. They're all mandatory unless they're one of the listed exemptions to the make inoperative prohibition (part 595) or otherwise stated. States regulate that generally by some variation of "operating an unsafe vehicle" rules, e.g. VC 24002 in CA. Those rules deliberately take a wide view of what unsafe means, but broadly include things that would prevent passing inspections like failing to meet FMVSS. Note that I'm not talking about the actual chance of getting dinged for operating a vehicle this way, because we all know there's effectively no real enforcement here.
- torstenvl 3y agoCali. Veh. Code 24002 does not require a vehicle to become inoperable if the backup camera fails. It does not reference backup cameras at all in the text, and there is no case law to support that interpretation. You have been given plenty of opportunities to make your case and have refused to do so. I think it's pretty clear by now that you're just being disingenuous.
- AlotOfReading 3y agoPlease enlighten me. What are the vehicle codes that specify which component failures render a vehicle unfit for operation? Let's say something obvious like brakes or lights.
- torstenvl 3y agoNew York: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/VAT/T3A9 https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/VAT/T3A9 California: https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-vehicle-code/division-12-equipment-of-vehicles https://casetext.com/statute/california-codes/california-veh... Illinois: Chapter 12 at https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1815&ChapterID=49 https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=1815&C... Michigan: https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-300-1949-VI-EQUIPMENT.pdf https://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-300-194... Your turn.