2 ms·
That was, I believe, they judge they wanted to get in front of. At one point there was another judge in that district that they didn't want to get in front of a
by jmyeet 3y ago
That was, I believe, they judge they wanted to get in front of. At one point there was another judge in that district that they didn't want to get in front of and a law firm just so happened to employ the second judge's son (? IIRC).
- grungyneer 3y agoJudge Jacqueline Scott Corley didn't recuse herself from hearing the Microsoft-Activision FTC case just because her son works at Microsoft (and ruled in msfts favor!) So are recusals for such conflicts really optional? https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/will-the-biggest-tech-merger-of-all https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/will-the-biggest-tech-mer...