6 ms·
That's true today, I agree. Having watched this movie a few times, I like to have the insurance policy of open source licensing so that it stays true tomorrow.
by jddj 3y ago
That's true today, I agree.
Having watched this movie a few times, I like to have the insurance policy of open source licensing so that it stays true tomorrow.
Once something is proprietary it's arguably easier from a developer perspective - and preferred from an investor perspective - to make it steadily more proprietary over time.
Then one day you wake up and even if your notes still aren't saved in some some obtuse format that only loads properly in Obsidian, your experience has gradually degraded but by this stage you've got so much tied up in the proprietary extras that you stick around unhappily.
- qup 3y agoWhat are the examples you've seen do this?
- throwup238 3y agoEvernote, one of Obsidian’s predecessors.
- jddj 3y agoEarliest example might have been AOL. Some others would be Microsoft's embrace extend extinguish, much of cloud vendors' repackaging of OSS, evernote, to a certain extent the recent Reddit and twitter API changes, IoT devices which get buyin based on open standards and then move increasingly critical features to proprietary unpublished/out of band comms. I feel like it's quite a well-worn page of the tech playbook and I'm probably only scratching the surface here.
- theshrike79 3y agoObsidian is hardly AOL or Microsoft sized :) And the second they go full evil, I can just point _any_ editor to the same directory structure and stuff will mostly Just Work.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]