4 ms·
I've tried Obsidian time and again, but the lack of mobile feature parity (even on an iPad) is still a big blocker for me.
by rcarmo 3y ago
I've tried Obsidian time and again, but the lack of mobile feature parity (even on an iPad) is still a big blocker for me.
- ssgodderidge 3y agoWhich features in particular?
- rbits 3y agoIn my experience mobile feature parity has been pretty good. All of my plugins are compatible, and I don't notice any missing features.
- lambdas 3y agoReally? The sole feature/plugin I’ve noticed not available is git, but working copy fills that hole for me. Not noticed a single other thing, I’ve been super impressed with parity between the platforms in fact.
- rchaud 3y agoWhat do you mean? I switched away from Logseq specifically because Obsidian had almost no differences between the desktop and mobile apps. Logseq on mobile could not run any plugins, Obsidian supports them all.
- rcarmo 3y agoIt’s not just the plugins, the editor experience (toolbars, menus, layout) is too kludgy to be useful.
- vergessenmir 3y agoI find the desktop and mobile experience you be fairly aligned. There are few plugins I've installed that won't work on the mobile version (e g Surfing plugin)