4 ms·
It didn't necessarily affect the application/hiring process. It had to do with recruitment policies on "poaching". To conceptualize it, Google/Apple/Pixar/etc
by deaddodo 3y ago
It didn't necessarily affect the application/hiring process. It had to do with recruitment policies on "poaching".
To conceptualize it, Google/Apple/Pixar/etc were paying (hypothetically) 100k each for SEngs. The rest of the industry was paying 80k. The aforementioned companies would only poach from the lower paying companies, with an offer to bring the employees up to 100k, thereby ensuring that all of the best talent was funnelling in to the big companies.
To ensure that talent stayed cheap, they (under the table) agreed not to poach from each other, since the only companies that could compete (generally) with their current salary would be the other big names.
So, they got the best of all worlds. The best talent. At deflated rates. And the talent would naturally gravitate to their preferred employers/optimal workspaces via proactive applications.