defense stopped a deposition where he was presenting (top of p4) + 'contacted' the NC board of examiners he ignored them, defense submitted formal complaint, b

defense stopped a deposition where he was presenting (top of p4) + 'contacted' the NC board of examiners he ignored them, defense submitted formal complaint, board ended up seeking declaratory judgment that both his research and his testimony separately violate the Engineering and Land Surveying Act from the opinion https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Nutt-v.-Ritter-opinion.pdf https://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Nutt-v.-Ritter-opi... > The Board seeks a counter-declaration that Nutt's engineering work for the plaintiffs in the Autry litigation, including his engineering calculations, analysis, and resulting expert report, constituted the unauthorized practice of engineering. The Board also seeks the same declaration regarding "testifying at the discovery depositions in support of the work contained in the expert report prepared by Wayne Nutt."