4 ms·
He states that the Erlang server only needed a single box vs. the 80-200 for the Ruby; I'd wager the Erlang is dramatically lower in terms of resources consumed
by ConstantineXVI 15y ago
He states that the Erlang server only needed a single box vs. the 80-200 for the Ruby; I'd wager the Erlang is dramatically lower in terms of resources consumed (or at least much more efficient)