3 ms·
I 100% get this point of view, I don't really care about performance more than I need to to ensure stuff doesn't grind to a crawl but. . . I can't help but feel
by benrutter 3y ago
I 100% get this point of view, I don't really care about performance more than I need to to ensure stuff doesn't grind to a crawl but. . . I can't help but feel something has gone wrong in software where things are, by default, very slow.
I've spent time optimizing code in the past (mostly python) and its not hard to speed things up a lot. It feels at times though that the ecosystem is working against you.
Tools like electron encourage you to ship many many times more download size than is needed. Python loops speeds are getting better, but they've historically been insanely slow.
I don't think we need to individually obsess over speed, but as an industry we need to give people the tools so that code is performing by default. I think we're moving away from that end.
- wredcoll 3y agoIf you think electron's 500 megs is bad, wait until people start shipping LLMs that clock in at dozens of gigs.
- fomine3 3y agoI don't blame how LLMs big, because it's needed for now. We theoretically don't need individual Electron runtime for each application. There should have a common webview runtime, like Microsoft WebView2.