What's so hard to understand? They'd rather filter sites that track in the first place. Sure today, in a world that developed without that, that would remove

What's so hard to understand? They'd rather filter sites that track in the first place. Sure today, in a world that developed without that, that would remove most of the internet, but so what? That just means their principle vs practical set point lands on a different part of the scale than you, but so does everyone's vs everyone else's. It's a great idea to imagine, if that were somehow possible and the norm, would it still be most of the internet? Would good old unprincipled pragmatic market forces not result in most sites somehow finding a way to be in front of everyone's eyes?