The implicit bias is right there in the title, "Who Gets to Work From Home." As if WFH is a reward given to good little boys and girls instead of a business dec

The implicit bias is right there in the title, "Who Gets to Work From Home." As if WFH is a reward given to good little boys and girls instead of a business decision with nuanced rationale and its own set of management challenges that need to be understood in order to be successfully implemented. The article also completely ignores the upsides of reduced traffic and commute times, less exposure to (potentially sick) coworkers, longer term increases in urban housing availability, etc. that WFH provides to those whose jobs still require their physical presence. They started with the conclusion and are trying to work back from there.