6 ms·

Based on their own judgement on what is popular or not, in the "community".

by johansch 15y ago

rbanffy 15y ago
I'm pretty sure they'll accept payment to host an unpopular private site.
- HoLyVieR 15y ago
  They used to, but now they don't. You can see their official answer here : http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/83591/how-to-run-a-private-stack-exchange-like-site/83682#83682 http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/83591/how-to-run-a-p...
  - jessriedel 15y ago
    Why is that? Why wouldn't they take the money if someone wants to license their software and host a private Q&A site? The FAQ doesn't give a reason.
    - _ikke_ 15y ago
      Because they believe a good community is part of the success of a stackexchange site. By allowing people to artificial keep up a topic site, the chance is big you'll create 'ghost towns' where there's nobody to answer questions, which would be detrimental to the users experience. That's why they enforce people to incubate a topic site and only allow it to go through if it's substantial enough.
      - rbanffy 15y ago
        They also mention their goal, when SE was started, was to make the web a better place (and to get rid of Experts Exchange). A "ghost town" has little chance of making the web a better place. It kind of makes sense. However, if you run a private support site that requires login and is, therefore, not googlable, it wouldn't pollute the web and they could consider hosting it, provided their platform supports the feature. If you want to have your own SE-like site, you may want to look into AskBot - it's very good.
      - jessriedel 15y ago
        OK, so are they worried ghost towns will reduce the value of the stack exchange brand? I mean, even if they are being altruistic, I still don't understand the societal harm caused by ghost towns.
        rbanffy 15y ago
        How many times have you googled some question just to find out the solution was correct 5 years ago but doesn't work with any current release of the software your are using? Recently, the Ubuntu community took down a lot of wiki pages that had howtos for ancient versions of the OS.
johansch 15y ago
I am pretty sure this is a correct and relevant factual statement. Yet someone with more privileges than me voted it down. Am not impressed.
- HoLyVieR 15y ago
  Your statement is mostly incorrect, the metric they use to evaluate the performance of a site is clearly indicated on Area51 and you can see the progress (or decline) on the proposal page of each website.

Based on their own judgement on what is popular or not, in the "community".

rbanffy 15y ago

I'm pretty sure they'll accept payment to host an unpopular private site.

HoLyVieR 15y ago
They used to, but now they don't. You can see their official answer here : http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/83591/how-to-run-a-private-stack-exchange-like-site/83682#83682 http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/83591/how-to-run-a-p...
- jessriedel 15y ago
  Why is that? Why wouldn't they take the money if someone wants to license their software and host a private Q&A site? The FAQ doesn't give a reason.
  - _ikke_ 15y ago
    Because they believe a good community is part of the success of a stackexchange site. By allowing people to artificial keep up a topic site, the chance is big you'll create 'ghost towns' where there's nobody to answer questions, which would be detrimental to the users experience. That's why they enforce people to incubate a topic site and only allow it to go through if it's substantial enough.
    - rbanffy 15y ago
      They also mention their goal, when SE was started, was to make the web a better place (and to get rid of Experts Exchange). A "ghost town" has little chance of making the web a better place. It kind of makes sense. However, if you run a private support site that requires login and is, therefore, not googlable, it wouldn't pollute the web and they could consider hosting it, provided their platform supports the feature. If you want to have your own SE-like site, you may want to look into AskBot - it's very good.
    - jessriedel 15y ago
      OK, so are they worried ghost towns will reduce the value of the stack exchange brand? I mean, even if they are being altruistic, I still don't understand the societal harm caused by ghost towns.
      - rbanffy 15y ago
        How many times have you googled some question just to find out the solution was correct 5 years ago but doesn't work with any current release of the software your are using? Recently, the Ubuntu community took down a lot of wiki pages that had howtos for ancient versions of the OS.

johansch 15y ago

I am pretty sure this is a correct and relevant factual statement. Yet someone with more privileges than me voted it down. Am not impressed.

HoLyVieR 15y ago
Your statement is mostly incorrect, the metric they use to evaluate the performance of a site is clearly indicated on Area51 and you can see the progress (or decline) on the proposal page of each website.