I've picked this one over throughout the years, and every step of the argument is chock full of bad assumptions. My favourite has always been with the final st

I've picked this one over throughout the years, and every step of the argument is chock full of bad assumptions. My favourite has always been with the final step: "If God exists in the mind, a greater version of God would be one that existed in reality, therefore God must exist in reality." OR, far more likely, as Anselm lacked sufficient other proof that he had to try out this little logical rope-a-dope, the understanding of "God" that lives in his mind is flawed.