2 ms·
> rather than actually addressing the source of his anxiety. > If the staff had been given proper training into dealing with neuro-atypical patients, there wou
by viraptor 3y ago
> rather than actually addressing the source of his anxiety.
> If the staff had been given proper training into dealing with neuro-atypical patients, there would have been no need for sedation.
You're making some serious assumptions here. 1. The source of anxiety could be dealt with at the time. 2. The training would be applicable at the time. 3. A different approach would require no sedation. 4. There was time for a calming approach given what had to be done at the time.
Sure, we should improve things, but also when you end up in the ICU, the priorities are a bit different than during a routine doctor visit - we don't know whether that situation could be dealt with without any kind of restraints/sedatives.
- whatshisface 3y ago5) they gave a patient a medication they were known to be allergic to and then they died.
- viraptor 3y agoThe parent was talking specifically about addressing the "source of anxiety". That's separate to the medication/allergy issue.
- sudodudeo 3y agoHaving a negative reaction to the meds is not the same as an allergy.
- whatshisface 3y agoAllergies are the only place the US medical system has for repeatable negative reactions so all of them go in.