> Experts who read the NY Times know how to read through the intentional narrative/propaganda The parent already cited the Iraq War coverage, in which they inc

> Experts who read the NY Times know how to read through the intentional narrative/propaganda The parent already cited the Iraq War coverage, in which they incited the country to violence with known lies, leading to hundreds of thousands of innocent civilian deaths. If this isn’t enough to swear you off their coverage, I honestly don’t know what else would. But to your point, the NY Times has millions of readers and this is a very small subsection of their audience. Which do you think is a more important function of journalism: lying to the masses in a way that is understood to be propaganda by your so-called “experts” or telling the majority of people the truth in the first place?