3 ms·
> a. the student had a legitimate complaint So what? Why didn't he walk down to the LCSR and ask politely instead of sending a poorly-written nasty e-mail? >
by acuozzo 15y ago
> a. the student had a legitimate complaint
So what? Why didn't he walk down to the LCSR and ask politely instead of sending a poorly-written nasty e-mail?
> b. the recipient should have just done it instead of wasting time writing that nonsensical response(seriously, it's not even funny)
I would've loved receiving this reply if I were ``USER NAME''. You don't enjoy absurd humor much, do you?
> c. the university seems to find the incompetence of their employees amusing, even 13 years later
One webpage doesn't speak for a university of >30,000.
- shpoonj 15y agoa. the response poorly written. the initial message was to the point b. no c. yes it does
- acuozzo 15y ago> a. the response poorly written. the initial message was to the point In what way(s) was the response poorly written? > b. no That's unfortunate. > c. yes it does ``You cannot reach that conclusion from the evidence given'' --shpoonj