4 ms·
It is the most expensive power source. Cost is prohibitive without the state footing part of the bill. And depending on the type of power station, it is not as
by viktorcode 3y ago
It is the most expensive power source. Cost is prohibitive without the state footing part of the bill. And depending on the type of power station, it is not as reliable too: remember past year France shut down few of their nuclear plants due to the draught causing water levels in rivers to drop? They needed that water for circuit cooling.
- snickerer 3y agoThere was always only one real reason to have nuclear power plants: to produce the base material for atomic weapons.
- exabrial 3y agoThis is so categorically false and can easily be disproven by any educated person, which you are apparently not.
- retinaros 3y agothe best thing with people preaching renewable its that it became a religion where facts do not mater. french nuclear energy got destroyed by recent governments and political mowement backed by germany and green party that wanted france nuclear industry to disappear. if not for the war in ukraine france would not have done a 180. plants shut down because under investment, government asking operators to reduce workforce with negative growth for over a decade. all because of the renewable religion. meanwhile germany destroy its cities to dig coal and power its country when there is no wind. oh and wind is renewable but not the device producing the energy, it lasts barely 20 years with regular maintenance and hen you heed to burry the turbines. its a ponzi.