3 ms·
Interestingly the formality ladder flips at the very top of the hierarchy. Kings and popes must be addressed diffusely with plurals and layered references to of
by pavlov 3y ago
Interestingly the formality ladder flips at the very top of the hierarchy. Kings and popes must be addressed diffusely with plurals and layered references to official status (“Your Imperial Majesty”), but the Christian God above them is a “thou” in every European language.
(Useless trivia bit… Apparently Emperor Charles V invented the styling of “His Majesty”. Before him, kings and emperors were addressed as highnesses, but he wanted something fancier after being crowned as the Holy Roman Emperor in addition to the kingships he already held.)
- 082349872349872 3y agoThat's because the english notion of informal/formal is a poor fit for the modern, symmetric use of T-V. It's more of a social distance, with V-form for people outside the personal sphere, and T-form for people outside the public sphere. So, as an atheist, I'd use V-form* with the Christian God, but His Believers really ought to be using T-form with Him. * Si vous plaît, j'aimerais bien savior comment fonctionne la turbulence ... mais ne vous inquiétez pas si l'explication serait trop compliqué !
- School-Cotton 3y agoLa turbulence ?
- 082349872349872 3y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence#Kolmogorov's_theory_of_1941 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence#Kolmogorov's_theory... see also https://www.newscientist.com/letter/mg12416936-800-letter-last-word/ https://www.newscientist.com/letter/mg12416936-800-letter-la... (but the way I heard the joke is that the scientist has planned to ask Him how to resolve gravitation with quantum mechanics, and only then the bystanders inquire, why not ask about turbulence?)
- euroderf 3y ago> Kings and popes must be addressed diffusely with plurals So I guess "the royal 'We'" falls under "believing your own marketing".