I think I can agree with this. He was as prolific as Euler was in mathematics, but perhaps a tad more of a genius (hard to compare music and maths). > He seems

I think I can agree with this. He was as prolific as Euler was in mathematics, but perhaps a tad more of a genius (hard to compare music and maths). > He seems to have been entirely internally driven by his genius and his commitment to the eternal and divine. That's probably the only way to go strong for that long.