I envision it to be used by a production debating system in an analogous way to how policy debate should operate, which is to say this evidence being used as a

I envision it to be used by a production debating system in an analogous way to how policy debate should operate, which is to say this evidence being used as a "mostly factual" source of real information to cite as evidence alongside an LLMs current persuasion abilities. There's a startup already that's trying to do this, and they're working with us/using our dataset: https://chat.arguflow.ai/ https://chat.arguflow.ai/ The dataset itself certainly has tags that are emotional or evidence that's citing like musical lyrics. Kritikal debaters have thought of nearly every strange argument you can imagine. The fact that you can make en even better progressive policy debater with it today than the speed talking adderal/coke addicts doing it at the highest levels of NDT/CEDA is just a bonus. I'm glad I've out of the activity long enough to agree that spreading/speed talking is stupid, but when you're deep in that world - the elitism associated with it is seductive.