4 ms·
TIL, thank you! Still, though - the original statement wasn't false, it _wasn't_ legal advice, and the clarification did make that clear in such a way that a r
by scubbo 3y ago
TIL, thank you!
Still, though - the original statement wasn't false, it _wasn't_ legal advice, and the clarification did make that clear in such a way that a reader couldn't be confused into thinking that it was reliable. So - it wasn't a _useless_ thing to write, as the original commenter implied, even if it doesn't have legal weight as I mistakenly thought.
- eviks 3y agoNice goal post shifting, though you're still mistaken in how low you assess the intelligence of the readers (and even real "legal advice" can be unreliable, so you're a bit confused here as well)