The article mentions two separate “fun coaches” (one whose course is $555) and interviews several graduates of their classes. It uses those vignettes to make c

The article mentions two separate “fun coaches” (one whose course is $555) and interviews several graduates of their classes. It uses those vignettes to make claims about the state of fun for all Americans. At best, this seems like an article on how fun is for a certain niche subset of wealthy Americans. I’m not sure they’re justified in broadening their conclusions here.