3 ms·
You are right, but no language has tried to claim the space of giving the user more control, so C remains the lowest level language we have that is portable. I
by quelsolaar 3y ago
You are right, but no language has tried to claim the space of giving the user more control, so C remains the lowest level language we have that is portable. I think there are lots of opportunities in this space, but i don't know of anyone working on it.
- kaba0 3y agoC++, Rust, Zig all are lower level, due to having control over vectors.