4 ms·

Meta: I wanted to point out some bad UX-element on this website just for fun, but the more I look, the more I like it. No pop-ups, no pop-overs no tooltips, no

Meta: I wanted to point out some bad UX-element on this website just for fun, but the more I look, the more I like it. No pop-ups, no pop-overs no tooltips, no request to sign up for newsletter and it loads fast. Scrolling is not hijacked, text is readable. The only thing I'm not a fan of is this shade of pink, but I must concede that it is subjective. I guess I give up on this one. Anyway... personally I'm happy for the CT's design. All other cars look exactly the same. Which I'm not a huge fan of CT, but I'm a fan of change, finally. We haven't had such a brave design since the Fiat Multipla. But this one doesn't look like the new car of Mr Bean.

kiba 3y ago
I like the departure of the design, but I am definitely not a fan of the visual style. I prefer something less polygonal.
- readthenotes1 3y ago
  When you are driving it, how much time do you spend outside looking at it?
6510 3y ago
I always see tons of hilarious UI mistakes on all websites. They are often hilarious because of how difficult the css solution is. I started looking at the left top, zoomed a bit and the 3rd menu entry (game design) dropped into a ... sub menu with a single entry long before the space ran out. Hyperlinks in black on a white background? The name of the website is to small and the font is boring. The advertisement at the top is huge and has lots of white space around it. Everything above the fold, except from the article title is clutter/garbage. That is, under the assumption the idea for me to read their article. It seems more like I'm visiting to view as many ads as humanly possible? The rant about the car is just collateral damage?
- 6510 3y ago
  A funny one would be the height of the advertisement slots not always matching the height of the advertisements creating a large gap above the text under it while the text above is very close to it. You could make the space around the banner much larger so that above and below look more similar. If one does that, it still design tho?
Kiro 3y ago
On mobile it feels like a spam site, infested with ads that look like they are part of the article.

kiba 3y ago

I like the departure of the design, but I am definitely not a fan of the visual style. I prefer something less polygonal.

readthenotes1 3y ago
When you are driving it, how much time do you spend outside looking at it?

6510 3y ago

I always see tons of hilarious UI mistakes on all websites. They are often hilarious because of how difficult the css solution is. I started looking at the left top, zoomed a bit and the 3rd menu entry (game design) dropped into a ... sub menu with a single entry long before the space ran out. Hyperlinks in black on a white background? The name of the website is to small and the font is boring. The advertisement at the top is huge and has lots of white space around it. Everything above the fold, except from the article title is clutter/garbage. That is, under the assumption the idea for me to read their article. It seems more like I'm visiting to view as many ads as humanly possible? The rant about the car is just collateral damage?

6510 3y ago
A funny one would be the height of the advertisement slots not always matching the height of the advertisements creating a large gap above the text under it while the text above is very close to it. You could make the space around the banner much larger so that above and below look more similar. If one does that, it still design tho?

Kiro 3y ago

On mobile it feels like a spam site, infested with ads that look like they are part of the article.