Yuck example, but it's a point. We aren't talking about something as extreme here, however. Given that hyperbole in journalism is common, I think we ought to

Yuck example, but it's a point. We aren't talking about something as extreme here, however. Given that hyperbole in journalism is common, I think we ought to hope for enough information to validate where it wouldn't be reprehensible or unlawful to provide it. I was guilty of hyperbole myself with the worthless comment, thanks for the reality check. :) (and fortunately you could see the article and judge that I'd overstated it!)