Right, for the site proclaiming to be for free speech it doesn't seem that their in favor of practicing transparent speech i.e. Showing the court case or the in

Right, for the site proclaiming to be for free speech it doesn't seem that their in favor of practicing transparent speech i.e. Showing the court case or the individuals involved in the takedown: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monark_(podcaster) https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monark_(podcaster) You can think of the case against this individual as you please, my gripe with the site is that I just cannot trust outlets that brand themselves as an interest group and then withholds information when convenient, since then it's just propaganda. Oh and doing some further digging they even manages to somehow misread the EU media freedom act so badly that they quote a part of it that clearly states to protect journalists against Spyware, and yet they write that the EU wants to use Spyware against journalists.[1] And in the same article they paint orban as some freedom fighter of free speech. [1] . [1]https://reclaimthenet.org/eu-media-freedom-act-passes-key-vote https://reclaimthenet.org/eu-media-freedom-act-passes-key-vo...