3 ms·
No, that was 2022. I'm talking about this one: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603269.3604821 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603269.3604821
by kromem 3y ago
No, that was 2022.
I'm talking about this one: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603269.3604821 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603269.3604821
- programjames 3y agoLook at the author list... Dirk Englund. What do you mean by "no"? Do you mean, not that paper (that neither of us linked because there are probably several on matrix multiplication) but instead this other one that also has optics and ml and Dirk? I'm seeing a pattern of you understanding what you write, but it being impossible to decipher on my end.
- kromem 3y agoYou said "I'm pretty sure you mean Dirk Englund's photonic matrix multiplication." No, I don't mean his photonic matrix multiplication from 2022. The issue seems more to be with your over specificity leading to ambiguity than anything else here.