Thank you for this context! >violation of multiple WP policies, repeat ban evasion, sockpuppeting, and IP hopping are all clearcut violation of the CFAA, which

Thank you for this context! >violation of multiple WP policies, repeat ban evasion, sockpuppeting, and IP hopping are all clearcut violation of the CFAA, which is a federal criminal act Is there legal precedent that each and every one of these actions, individually, is a criminal violation of the CFAA? That seems like a bold claim. The DC Circuit, at least, has specifically ruled violating TOS is not a CFAA violation.[1] So, it seems fairly inaccurate to say violating “WP policies” is a “clearcut violation of the CFAA”. I’m not sure about legal precedent for the other actions, but I’d be skeptical. [1] https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/sandvig_opinion.pdf https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/sand...