4 ms·
> IMO you shouldn't censor anything. That's the only solution. The two things that immediately come to my mind are the organisation of the genocide of Rohingya
by lostlogin 3y ago
> IMO you shouldn't censor anything. That's the only solution.
The two things that immediately come to my mind are the organisation of the genocide of Rohingya [1] and the live streaming of the Christchurch mosque massacre [2]. Both of these were promoted by Facebook too I believe.
Free speech absolutists see no issue with allowing that content to exist. I believe in free speech, but believe it has limits. It’s good to see the FB employee, dehrmann, with sane (personal) comments.
[1] https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-facebooks-systems-promoted-violence-against-rohingya-meta-owes-reparations-new-report/ https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-faceb...
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/29/facebook-new-zealand-christchurch-attack-response https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/29/facebook-new...