4 ms·
Damn, thanks for pointing that out. That's way more than an acceptable number of errors for a book like this, imo.
by doubleg72 3y ago
Damn, thanks for pointing that out. That's way more than an acceptable number of errors for a book like this, imo.
- mat_epice 3y ago105 errata (pretty small ones) in a 1000-page book. For highly technical work, I'd say that's not too bad. Looking at the errata for Vol I of TAOCP, there's a lot more for a much shorter work (600 pages).
- kragen 3y agobooks that have less errors per page generally do not contain factual information of course many factual books have less reported errors per page, but that's not at all the same thing