4 ms·
Space seems to expand in the absence of anything, and mass and its agent gravity appear to counteract that natural expansion of distance. If this is in fact tru
by fnordpiglet 3y ago
Space seems to expand in the absence of anything, and mass and its agent gravity appear to counteract that natural expansion of distance. If this is in fact true, I don’t think it’s astronomically hard but impossible to directly manipulate space. Space isn’t actually a thing to be manipulated, it’s a description of the apparent distance between things of reference. The discussion of space warping around mass etc is a convenient metaphor for what we observe, the bowling ball on a blanket doesn’t mean there’s literally a blanket to be manipulated. It’s an effect we observe about relative distances being distorted in the metrics of distance and rate of information propagation. What medium these exist in, if any, is entirely unknown and is most likely non existent but is a description of observed effects, while space and time are simply descriptions of those effects.
- sigmoid10 3y agoThis is wrong. General Relativity tells us exactly how mass (or rather energy) affects spacetime. This has nothing to do with relative distances. The issue with wormholes and warp drives in general relativity is that they require weird forms of energy that we know exist in quantum mechanics, but may not work on macroscopic scales.