3 ms·
It seems that the problems he had were in summer. There's many climates where HRVs are only really needed in winter - in which case those problems wouldn't happ
by leoedin 3y ago
It seems that the problems he had were in summer. There's many climates where HRVs are only really needed in winter - in which case those problems wouldn't happen.
Basically, as long as the outside air is drier than the inside air, an HRV will work well. The moment the outside air contains more moisture, ventilating will just drive up the humidity of your space - causing many issues.
- jnsaff2 3y agoIn my climate the problem is air being too dry inside during winter. Outside air is normal humidity 50-80% RH at -10C. Inside it will be 20% and way too dry. Ventilation, heat recovery and moisture recovery would be ideal. During summer we rarely cook with and AC and windows are open most of the time.
- mnw21cam 3y agoAbsolutely, there are plenty of climates where HRV (aka MVHR) is quite sufficient. In inland areas (most of the US, and a fair chunk of Europe), the temperature difference between summer and winter is enough that a HRV is unlikely to be sufficient. Somewhere like the UK or somewhere near the equator and high altitude, a HRV system probably will be absolutely fine. In the UK, the outside air dew point in the depths of winter is likely to be between -5 and 15 °C, and in summer likely between 10 and 25 °C. That might be a little dry at the driest, and a little sticky on a couple of days in the summer, but it's perfectly reasonable to just bring that air into the house without messing with the humidity. Most UK houses are too humid and don't have enough ventilation. However, as soon as you start wanting to cool a house because the outside air is too hot, then that outside air will basically have 100% relative humidity when it is cooled to your house temperature, and it will probably have condensed out a load of its moisture onto whatever was cooling it, so you absolutely do need to mess with the humidity.