3 ms·
It would be consistent with motivating the confused cognition (e.g.: her rambling and contradictory statements in the article linked by OP), and producing false
by dbspin 3y ago
It would be consistent with motivating the confused cognition (e.g.: her rambling and contradictory statements in the article linked by OP), and producing false or disingenuous allegations. However so could lots of other things. My point wasn't to diagnose this person, but to make clear "it seems pretty clear something terrible happened to her and was invalidated" is a dubious rationale for believing any kind of allegation.
- mcpackieh 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoWe've banned this account for posting in the flamewar style and ignoring our requests to stop: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38031673 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38031673 (Oct 2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37708114 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37708114 (Sept 2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36792165 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36792165 (July 2023) If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future. They're here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.