2 ms·
Countries are careful about calling other countries terror organisations. That's a weak argument. To convince me, you have to argue that their actions aren't te
by mort96 3y ago
Countries are careful about calling other countries terror organisations. That's a weak argument. To convince me, you have to argue that their actions aren't terroristic.
Usually, you can argue that a state's actions aren't "terrorism" because most definitions of "terrorism" involve the requirement that the action is illegal. But saying that the IDF is regularly committing war crimes isn't even controversial at this point. So what exactly separates their illegal actions intended to instil terror from all the other terror organizations?
- transformi 3y ago[flagged]
- fwefqf 3y ago[flagged]
- mort96 3y agoThis response is deranged. Human rights organisation have been criticising Israel for its crimes for a long time, even before this massacre. Hell, just look at the list of UN resolutions condemning Israel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolutions_concerning_Israel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_resolut... The only correct thing in your comment is that Hamas is also bad. Please do research before spreading war crime apologia.