It’s not so hypothetical. They’re already stealing copyrighted works and putting them in the AI’s. I put a list of them with their licenses in the “Proving Wron

It’s not so hypothetical. They’re already stealing copyrighted works and putting them in the AI’s. I put a list of them with their licenses in the “Proving Wrongdoing” section of my article: http://gethisword.com/tech/exploringai/index.html http://gethisword.com/tech/exploringai/index.html I also put a copyright proposal in there which should work for all the competing interests. I mean, people will still be greedy. Yet, I think it’s a win to allow all copyrighted works to be used for training while restricting only the outputs to only the degree we do for people. Personally, I really hope the law allows GPT4-style AI’s to be built legally and affordable. If so, there’s so many benefits to be gained in businesses we can start, augmenting workers to improve work/life/productivity balance, and non-profit projects. Plus, whichever countries don’t do it will be left behind in this area by the countries that make AI training easier. Japan is the only one I’ve heard made it legal to use copyrighted works for data-science models. I don’t know that you can distribute them like The Pile or Common Crawl, though. If you scraped or bought it yourself, Japan is the closest thing I know to being legal under copyright law.