2 ms·
> the author has protected themselves from this that's obviously false, nothing could protect anyone from being threatened (nor from some frivolous lawsuit), a
by eviks 3y ago
> the author has protected themselves from this
that's obviously false, nothing could protect anyone from being threatened (nor from some frivolous lawsuit), and to do CBA you'd need to actually do analysis of what the benefit is
(also, where is your legal liability disclaimer if it's clearly worthwhile? You've made a public legal assessment of the op's legal liability disclaimer)
- scubbo 3y ago> that's obviously false, nothing could protect anyone from being threatened (nor from some frivolous lawsuit) Apologies - I assumed you had the ability to read between the lines that they were "protected" in the sense that they could safely ignore any such threat because they could be confident that it would fail, whereas without this protection they might feel vulnerable enough to need to defend themselves with it.
- eviks 3y agoYou could try reading the lines before impugning someone's ability to read between them. Frivolous lawsuit by definition doesn't care about legal merits, including your own fail criterion: "[frivolous litigation] includes presenting an argument with reason to know that it would certainly faill (Wikipedia) So again, no magic disclaimers can help you here, you still face the risks that someone is going to impose (or threat to impose) the burden of legal proceedings regardless of legal merit on you