> my point was that to the human mind (we all learn to count as toddlers), 2 emerges from 1+1 more than 1+1 emerges from 2. I feel like I'm reading the paper th

> my point was that to the human mind (we all learn to count as toddlers), 2 emerges from 1+1 more than 1+1 emerges from 2. I feel like I'm reading the paper that says the latter. When you crack an egg you say the egg yolk emerges. Similarly you can say that when you crack the classical mechanics shell you get parts of quantum mechanics. We didn't start from quantum mechanics and built up to classical, we started from classical and picked it apart until quantum emerged.