4 ms·

> Jain owned the car for less than 24 hours. You can damage a car in a few minutes of driving. >Jain didn't damage the car You know that how? Jain did damag

> Jain owned the car for less than 24 hours. You can damage a car in a few minutes of driving. >Jain didn't damage the car You know that how? Jain did damage that car. > Tesla initially agreed Jain didn't damage the car. Then Tesla changed its tune and claimed Jain damaged the car. They did an initial assessment and a more thorough assessment in the shop showed it was external damage.

clouddrover 3y ago
[flagged]
- simondotau 3y ago
  > The car failed. That's your belief. You weren't there. Look mate, we get it. Believing this fits your preconceptions as Hacker News' most obsessive and prolific hater of Tesla and Musk. In your view, anything bad that happens is Musk's fault. In your view, every single one of the million Tesla customers only ever tell the truth. It's the worst company on the planet exclusively selling cars to the most honest people who ever lived. That's your simple reality of it.
  - clouddrover 3y ago
    [flagged]
    - simondotau 3y ago
      [flagged]
      - clouddrover 3y ago
        [flagged]
- saturn_vk 3y ago
  The only entity that actually inspected the car said it was damaged. And I don't think you were there, so why state it with such misguided confidence?