"faulty software" compared to the human factor? that's like asking "do you trust a spreadsheet where the math is done by a computer and not verified by a human

"faulty software" compared to the human factor? that's like asking "do you trust a spreadsheet where the math is done by a computer and not verified by a human". At some point in history... the answer would be "no way I'd trust numbers not checked by a human". Today? It's easy to say we can trust software produced numbers. The question becomes what is that cross over point? Are you saying you don't think we'll get to a point where computers drive better than humans? I think we're closer to that point than you think and with defensive programming we can do so safely.