4 ms·
The article says he claims that he sometimes buys domains via GoDaddy. Why would he use GoDaddy since he can get them from cheaper (and more-ethical) domain nam
by NatW 14y ago
The article says he claims that he sometimes buys domains via GoDaddy. Why would he use GoDaddy since he can get them from cheaper (and more-ethical) domain name registrars than GoDaddy?
- citricsquid 14y agoCheaper than GoDaddy, like who? GoDaddy give awesome discounts if you're a bulk buyer. You can pay close to verisign price. It can work out more economical than running your own registrar if you're willing to trust GoDaddy. They also have great support for high quantity customers.
- NatW 14y agoI just researched it and fair enough! Though you can easily find cheaper prices if you're not a bulk customer, you may be right on bulk. Ok, then I guess he just doesn't care that he's supporting an ethically-challenged company that has supported SOPA, etc.. but that's not too surprising.. giving what he does for a living :).
- true_religion 14y agoGo-daddy is probably a loss leader when it comes to domains. They just use domain sales to try and upsell you to other things. If you're only buying bulk domains from them, you're not really supporting their business very much.
- slamdunc 14y agoThat was what jumped out at me as well - I could only think about the $100K that was going into GoDaddy's bank account. ALL the dozens of domains I've moved (and continue to move, sometimes one by one) hardly make a dent when compared to these bulk folks that still use GD. Oh, well, death by a thousand (hundred thousand) blows...
- citricsquid 14y agoThe majority of that $100K doesn't go to GoDaddy. I believe the current cost of a .com from verisign is $7.21 + $0.19 ICANN fee, then transactions fees etc... godaddy probably takes home about $0.50 per domain, so they made maybe $5k off this guy.
- slamdunc 14y agoOh, thank goodness (and thanks for the clarification - I hadn't thought it through very well).