3 ms·
Looks like typo, from chart it seems to be around 20x10^9 for weight subcloning (doesn't look like 16x10^9 <<which would be 4x>> either).
by mirekrusin 3y ago
Looks like typo, from chart it seems to be around 20x10^9 for weight subcloning (doesn't look like 16x10^9 <<which would be 4x>> either).