2 ms·
The return on investment would likely be quite low. Who should pay for this positive right?
by peterfirefly 3y ago
The return on investment would likely be quite low. Who should pay for this positive right?
- gjsman-1000 3y agoWell, YouTube’s got it 90% of the way there. I didn’t say the corporations would or should be forced to pay for anyone who knocks on the door.
- peterfirefly 3y agoOh, then we don't disagree. The internet is indeed wonderful in many ways and YouTube is a part of that -- from Indian videos about how to replace obscure components inside old printers to MIT Courseware and 3Blue1Brown. It's also possible to get a very good start on language learning using only YouTube videos. I hate artificial barriers -- but I also feel a need to warn about the bad consequences of unrestricted positive rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights