4 ms·
Why would you assume DEI programs led to people who were unqualified being hired? I never saw that. What I saw was a pool of 100 equally qualified people, and
by jedberg 3y ago
Why would you assume DEI programs led to people who were unqualified being hired? I never saw that. What I saw was a pool of 100 equally qualified people, and recruiting biased towards reaching out only to certain sub-groups of those people. But they didn't lower the hiring bar. They just only actively recruited people from certain groups.
I also saw during rounds of promotions where HR would say "here are all of the diversity candidates in your org. Let's make sure we're evaluating them for promotion and actively working towards giving them work that will get them promoted".
I never saw a case where two people were interviewed and the "diversity candidate" was less qualified but hired. Nor did I ever see a case where a diversity candidate was promoted ahead of someone else. Each was hired or promoted based on their own merits. The DEI part was making sure there were more in the pipeline to look at.
- local_crmdgeon 3y ago>Why would you assume DEI programs led to people who were unqualified being hired? Because I have seen it with my own eyes hundreds of times. Are you talking about your time at Reddit? Because that hiring process produced the hire and defense of one Aimee Challenor - I wouldn't be proud of that.
- jedberg 3y agoNo I haven't worked at reddit for 12 years now. I had nothing to do with that. I'm talking about what I've seen at Amazon and at the startups that I advise. And somehow I'm doubting you saw "hundreds" of hires that you knew well enough to evaluate that they were unqualified compared to the candidates they beat out.