3 ms·

sure. equal opportunity doesn't mean equal outcome.

• peterfirefly 3y ago
  The return on investment would likely be quite low. Who should pay for this positive right?
  • gjsman-1000 3y ago
    Well, YouTube’s got it 90% of the way there. I didn’t say the corporations would or should be forced to pay for anyone who knocks on the door.
    • peterfirefly 3y ago
      Oh, then we don't disagree. The internet is indeed wonderful in many ways and YouTube is a part of that -- from Indian videos about how to replace obscure components inside old printers to MIT Courseware and 3Blue1Brown. It's also possible to get a very good start on language learning using only YouTube videos. I hate artificial barriers -- but I also feel a need to warn about the bad consequences of unrestricted positive rights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_and_positive_rights