24 ms·
I got a Bluesky invite a few weeks ago, checked it out and … there were absolute crickets there. Most posts I found had 0 comments, 0 reposts and at most 1-dig
by josteink 3y ago
I got a Bluesky invite a few weeks ago, checked it out and … there were absolute crickets there.
Most posts I found had 0 comments, 0 reposts and at most 1-digit likes.
For a social network, it might have all the technology and protocol-work in place, but to me it seems to be failing pretty hard on the social bit?
Am I missing something? Are there certain topics, demographics or high-profile “influencers” thriving here?
Anyone here using bluesky and thinking it’s working out nicely?
- vitarnixofntrnt 3y ago[dead]
- elektor 3y agoIf you want more of the old school Twitter public square, you, then the Discourse feed where you want to be: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jfhpnnst6flqway4eaeqzj2a/feed/discourse https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jfhpnnst6flqway4eaeqzj2a/fe...
- wds 3y agoI've preferred it to Mastodon so far. Way too many abilities to it; BlueSky is just Twitter but open and not much more, which really, is all I want anyways.
- sundaeofshock 3y agoThis does not match my experience. I’m following several active posters — with thousands of followers — who post several times a day. Most of the posts I see get plenty of engagement. The demographics of the folks I follow tend towards the left of center. There are a large number of authors (eg Neil Gaiman) who are very active. There are is also a very pleasant lack of Nazis and white-supremacists. I love it there.
- threatofrain 3y agoThe web community has yet to join. They all have accounts with posts from months ago.