3 ms·
Unfortunately one of the caveats about what librsync is not (from the link): librsync also does not include any network functions for talking to SSH or any oth
by daveguy 3y ago
Unfortunately one of the caveats about what librsync is not (from the link):
librsync also does not include any network functions for talking to SSH or any other server. To access a remote filesystem, you need to provide your own code or make use of some other virtual filesystem layer.
Having this seems to be one of the primary requirements.
- necovek 3y agoI did not read the OP that way: cross platform support, fault-tolerance and ability to integrate into a bespoke client/server solution (iow, there is already a network client and a server). Even with that, librsync highlights that rsync is really a protocol rather than the CLI tool GP post referred to.