3 ms·
> focused on nonconsensual AI images for a startup that just got funding I mean that’s a pretty terrible thing. Certainly worth reporting on!
by TaylorAlexander 3y ago
> focused on nonconsensual AI images for a startup that just got funding
I mean that’s a pretty terrible thing. Certainly worth reporting on!
- infecto 3y agoI am not entirely sure. Not about the ai images but the away the piece was sensationalized. If you read the article it painted a picture that is all the startup did. Going to the website I could not even find the models, I am sure they existed though. Like I said before. I am not defending the morality but the way in which 404 writes article. It’s like reading a buzzfeed/celebrity outrage piece. Edit: I think it’s because after reading the original article I mentioned, I have a bias on how 404 writes pieces. That original article made me scared to even click the link to the company. I read a TechCrunch piece on the company and it painted a much better picture of the company and the challenges with being a marketplace/source for image models.